Questionnaire development for Ph.D is goal oriented, systematic process. Therefore, use of available questionnaire may not fulfil the purpose of Ph.d.
Another reason, each questionnaire development has specific purpose. For example, one used facet free job satisfaction questionnaire for Ph.D but this is not useful for change management where in satisfaction with different facets
(Satisfaction with pay, company policy, peers, supervisor, promotion etc.) is more important.
What is the purpose of Ph.D. in management? Is it for getting the degree ? As student of management, your purpose will be to contribute some theories to management. What is theory ? Theory is a set of propositions or the postulates that can explain change in the nature. Specifically for Ph.D., students are asked to contribute some new or innovative theories or methods. Here new means original thinking as provided by Maslow in developing Need hierarchy theory.
New theory comes through inductive reasoning. And by deductive reasoning, another theory can be developed as suggested by Herzberg in describing two factor theory of motivation.
In theory development, researcher uses some constructs. The constructs may come from the research insight or from observation or through review of literature. Purpose of the questionnaire development is to assess the construct.
Definition
Questionnaire refers to device consisting of the questions in order to determine individual differences in the construct. Individual responds to same construct in different manners resulting variations among individuals. Difference in response occurs due to individual difference.
Individual difference
Individual differences stand for the variation or deviations among individuals in regard to a single characteristic or number of characteristics.
These characteristics are due to hereditary, demographic (age, education, social status, income)
Organisational (hierarchy, job responsibility, department)
and psychological factors (personality, intelligence, aptitude, interest, value etc.). Individual difference occurs at different levels:
1. Intra individual
2. Inter individual
3. Individual and group
4. Intra group
5. Inter group
Observed and latent behaviour
The construct is made of both observed and unobserved behaviours. The unobserved is latent. And observed is manifestated. Usually, observed behaviours are collected for development of questionnaire. And the latent is inherent relationship among the characteristics that are imbibed within respondents. This latent phenomenon affects the change in criterion variable.
Item
It would be misnomer to assume that any statement is item. Item is the unit of behaviour and the construct is set of specific behaviour interrelated with each other.
Individual responds to the item in different manners. Therefore there will be individual difference in item selection.
Item should be related to the group of items in which it belongs to.
Item pool
Item pool is the reservoir of large number of items related to the construct. Number of item pool depends on the dimensionality of construct. One item pool is sufficient for assessing one-dimensional construct and more than one item pool is required for multidimensional construct. The dimensionality will be judged by the researcher based on well grounded theory. If the construct is new, it is necessary to write items based on strong intellectual reasoning. There are many techniques to collect items for the item pool. Some techniques are observation, participant observation, interview, focus group, Analysis of construct
Observation : Observation refers to
watching and listening to the behaviour of other persons over time without
manipulating and controlling it and record findings in ways that allow some
degree of analytical interpretation and discussion. In observation, researcher
writes detailed description of observed overt and covert actions, communications
along with background information, thoughts and emotions that encompass the
phenomenon. Overt behaviour does not give actual meaning of certain behaviour,
therefore attention should be paid to covert behaviour. The later helps to
understand the meaning of camouflaged social behaviour. In recording of
observation, attention should be paid to Inter-observer and intra observer
consistency. Former refers to consistency between observers and later refers to
consistency between observation of one observer across period of time. Cohen’s
Kappa is a measure of the degrees of agreement over the coding of items by two
people. One
observes others in naturalistic, experimental or in simulated environment.
Naturalistic observation refers to observation in natural habitat
where in observer acts as non-participant. In structured observation, observer designs some experimental condition where in
he can observe specific behaviour of the subject. Structured observation is
used to observe experimental data.
Participant observation: Participant
observation is a set of research strategies which aim to gain a close and
intimate familiarity with a given group of individuals (such as a religious,
occupational, or subcultural group, or a particular community) and their
practices through an intensive involvement with people in their natural
environment, often though not always over an extended period of time.
Interview
Interview provides potentially valuable information that
helps in exploring research variables. It ranges from informal to highly formal
interactions through unstructured and semi structured interview.
Informal Interviewing
It is
characterized by a total lack of structure or control. Researcher tries to
remember conversations heard during the course of a day in the field.
Unstructured
Interviewing
In informal interviewing,
respondent does not know that researcher collects data from the conversation.
But in unstructured interviewing, both know purpose of interview. In this
technique researcher has clear plan in mind, but he provides minimum control
over the people’s responses. The idea is to get people to open up and let
them express themselves in their own terms, and at their own pace. In unstructured interview, questions can be
changed or adapted to meet respondent’s intelligence, understanding, belief or
values. Unlike structured interview where in respondent is asked to choose pre
set answers, here interviewer gets chance to explore the meaning or reasons
behind the answer of respondents.
Semi-structured Interview
In situations, where in researcher does not
get chance to interview respondent more than once, semi-structured interview is
applicable. Like unstructured interview, semi structured interview is useful in
exploring variables.
Focus group
A focus group is a form of qualitative research in which a group of people are asked about their perceptions, opinions, beliefs, and attitudes towards a product, service, concept, advertisement, idea, or packaging.
Likert type
Likert-type scales are useful when you are measuring latent constructs - that is, characteristics of people such as attitudes, feelings, opinions, etc. Latent constructs are generally thought of as unobservable individual characteristics (meaning that there is no concrete, objective measurement) that are believed to exist and cause variations in behavior (e.g., answer questions on a scale).
Usually, Likert-type scales use statements ("Please rate the extent to which you agree/disagree with the following:") and use 5 or 7-point response scales (most commonly). The response scales use anchors such as 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, etc.
The items should be phrased in a way that only poses one characteristic per item so that it is clear what the person is responding to. For example, "I think politicians are honest and helpful" is not a good item because you are asking about two separate issues (honesty and helpfulness). Also, try to avoid using the word "not" or other negatives directly in these items as it can become confusing about what it means to disagree with a negative.
Likert-type scales can be scored in a variety of ways. Typically, you would score each item so that higher scores always indicate "more" of some characteristic and then take the mean (average) of all of the items. Remember, the numbers will not have any inherent meaning (e.g., if you are measuring attitudes about politicians, scoring a 3.4 doesn't REALLY mean anything except that, on average, that individual was slightly favorable in his/her attitudes and can then be compared to the distribution of the remaining responses).
Finally, you always want to check the reliability of Likert-type scales using Cronbach's Alpha (internal consistency). In general, you want values of .7 and up (the ceiling is 1.0) for good internal consistency. Mathematically, internal consistency is the average of all possible split-half correlations. Conceptually, it measures how welly the items function together (e.g., do people respond consistently with their standing on the construct of interest).
Usually, Likert-type scales use statements ("Please rate the extent to which you agree/disagree with the following:") and use 5 or 7-point response scales (most commonly). The response scales use anchors such as 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree, etc.
The items should be phrased in a way that only poses one characteristic per item so that it is clear what the person is responding to. For example, "I think politicians are honest and helpful" is not a good item because you are asking about two separate issues (honesty and helpfulness). Also, try to avoid using the word "not" or other negatives directly in these items as it can become confusing about what it means to disagree with a negative.
Likert-type scales can be scored in a variety of ways. Typically, you would score each item so that higher scores always indicate "more" of some characteristic and then take the mean (average) of all of the items. Remember, the numbers will not have any inherent meaning (e.g., if you are measuring attitudes about politicians, scoring a 3.4 doesn't REALLY mean anything except that, on average, that individual was slightly favorable in his/her attitudes and can then be compared to the distribution of the remaining responses).
Finally, you always want to check the reliability of Likert-type scales using Cronbach's Alpha (internal consistency). In general, you want values of .7 and up (the ceiling is 1.0) for good internal consistency. Mathematically, internal consistency is the average of all possible split-half correlations. Conceptually, it measures how welly the items function together (e.g., do people respond consistently with their standing on the construct of interest).
Likert type :http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/scallik.php
Observation : Researchers develop items from both overt and covert behaviour.
Table 3.1 shows observation record of school going behaviour of two students and it’s associated items to assess both overt and covert behaviour.
Definition
Questionnaire
refers to device consisting of the questions in order to determine individual
differences in the construct. Individual responds to same construct in different manners resulting variations among individuals
due to several factors - heredity, demographic,social and psychological factors. This suggests that
- Individual differences stand for the variation or deviations among individuals in regard to a single characteristic or number of characteristics.
due to several factors - heredity, demographic,social and psychological factors. This suggests that
- Individual differences stand for the variation or deviations among individuals in regard to a single characteristic or number of characteristics.
Questions are in the form of interrogative and
affirmative in nature. In case of affirmative modes, response categories will
determine the question status. Table 1 and 2 present a set of interrogative and
affirmative statements about awareness of safety rules by the employees in shop
floor,
And purpose of the questionnaire for Ph.D. is to contribute some construct in explaining some problems of management.
In human resource management, one of the major problem is to make optimization between worker needs and organizational needs. Dutta Roy (1988) in the young scientist award competition of the Indian Science Congress Association has shown this optimization by highlighting relation between Organizational health and Quality of Working life. The paper was award
I think the topic is very much challenging specially in the area of Organizational behaviour and Human Resource Management. With the rapid change in liberalization, privatization and globalization policies, Indian industries perceive lot of environmental uncertainties - workforce diversity (
comprises of people of different gender, age, social class, sexual orientation, values, personality characteristics, ethnicity, religion, education, language, physical appearance, martial status, lifestyle, beliefs, ideologies and background characteristics such as geographic origin, tenure with the organization, and economic status), continuous improvement initiatives (meeting up skill deficits by new training skill and development), re-engineering (modifying existing skills), the contingent work force (temporary recruitment of well trained workers for changing attitude, skills etc. of old workers),decentralized work sites and employee involvement.
http://www.hrwale.com/general-hr/current-trends-in-human-resource-management/
RETROACTION
Modern management is moving from non virtual to virtual reality. It is more guided by IT tools like SAP. Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (SAP) was founded in June, 1972, it was centered to only A type or big businesses. However over a period of time, small and medium size companies adopted SAP towards achieving organizational goals.
SAP Solution Manages
is the central lifecycle management hub for SAP systems and SAP solutions: on premise, or in the cloud. It accelerates innovation, manages application lifecycles, and runs solutions, end-to-end, on ONE integrated business and IT platform.
Organization becomes microscopic as one man by using the Net can run the organization. Another issue is social media. Social media directly or indirectly influence the formal and infomal group decisions. Overall management is rapidly changing with time and with environmental uncertainty.
No comments:
Post a Comment