Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Study skills for LD children

LD students are those who demonstrate a significant discrepancy, which is not the result of some other handicap, between academic achievement and intellectual abilities in one or more of the areas of oral expression, listening comprehension, written expression, basic reading skills, reading comprehension, mathematical calculation, mathematics reasoning, or spelling.
Following is a list of some of the common indicators of learning disabled students. These traits are usually not isolated ones; rather, they appear in varying degrees and amounts in most learning disabled students. A learning disabled student …

Has poor auditory memory—both short term and long term.

Has a low tolerance level and a high frustration level.

Has a weak or poor self-esteem.

Is easily distractible.

Finds it difficult, if not impossible, to stay on task for extended periods of time.

Is spontaneous in expression; often cannot control emotions.

Is easily confused.

Is verbally demanding.

Has some difficulty in working with others in small or large group settings.

Has difficulty in following complicated directions or remembering directions for extended periods of time.

Has coordination problems with both large and small muscle groups.

Has inflexibility of thought; is difficult to persuade otherwise.

Has poor handwriting skills.

Has a poor concept of time.

Teaching learning disabled youngsters will present you with some unique and distinctive challenges. Not only will these students demand more of your time and patience; so, too, will they require specialized instructional strategies in a structured environment that supports and enhances their learning potential. It is important to remember that learning disabled students are not students who are incapacitated or unable to learn; rather, they need differentiated instruction tailored to their distinctive learning abilities. Use these appropriate strategies with learning disabled students:

Provide oral instruction for students with reading disabilities. Present tests and reading materials in an oral format so the assessment is not unduly influenced by lack of reading ability.

Provide learning disabled students with frequent progress checks. Let them know how well they are progressing toward an individual or class goal.

Give immediate feedback to learning disabled students. They need to see quickly the relationship between what was taught and what was learned.

Make activities concise and short, whenever possible. Long, drawn-out projects are particularly frustrating for a learning disabled child.

Learning disabled youngsters have difficulty learning abstract terms and concepts. Whenever possible, provide them with concrete objects and events—items they can touch, hear, smell, etc.

Learning disabled students need and should get lots of specific praise. Instead of just saying, “You did well,” or “I like your work,” be sure you provide specific praising comments that link the activity directly with the recognition; for example, “I was particularly pleased by the way in which you organized the rock collection for Karin and Miranda.”

When necessary, plan to repeat instructions or offer information in both written and verbal formats. Again, it is vitally necessary that learning disabled children utilize as many of their sensory modalities as possible.

Encourage cooperative learning activities (see Teaching with Cooperative Learning) when possible. Invite students of varying abilities to work together on a specific project or toward a common goal. Create an atmosphere in which a true “community of learners” is facilitated and enhanced.




STUDY SKILLS
What are study skills?



Study skills instruction gives students the tools, the training, and the readiness to do a good job in school. The more adept students are with reading, writing, speaking and study skills, the more efficient and thorough they will be at getting the job of learning done.



"Metacognition" is a popular term to describe the learning process. It means transcending cognition, or more simply put, thinking about thinking. Study skills instruction develops a metacognitive approach to school; it helps them learn how to learn. Students need to go beyond simply completing an assignment. They need to be aware of the process they follow and the steps they take when pre-reading a textbook, taking notes, or answering an essay question.

When should study skills be taught?



Study skills instruction can begin as early as the elementary grades with organization skills and main idea skills. By fifth grade, students can begin to learn note taking strategies and basic textbook skills. Advanced note taking, summarizing, textbook, test preparation and report writing should be emphasized in middle school, and then practiced in high school. As students progress through the grades, they must develop a new set of skills to cope with greater demands: the higher the grade, the greater the need for study skills to cope with those demands.

SQ3R is a reading comprehension method named for its five steps: survey, question, read, retrieve, and review. The method was introduced by Francis P. Robinson, an American education philosopher in his 1946 book Effective Study.





1. Survey

First, you take a few minutes to scan the entire text. Pay attention to layout, chapters, sections, graphs, pictures, words in bold and italics. In general, these provide important information about the contents of the text. By quickly scanning through the text first, you create an overview and structure. This serves as the foundation for the active reading and understanding of the text.



2. Question

Ask yourself questions about the text that you scanned during the previous step. You can for instance turn the chapter titles into questions. Write down the questions. Ask yourself what you already know about the topic and what your goal is for reading the text. Try to understand what it is that the author wants to convey. You can use the left margin to write down your questions about the text in a structured way. At a later stage, you can note down the answers in the right margin.



3. Read

Read the text while keeping the structure from step 1, “S” and the questions from step 2, “Q” in the back of your mind. Pay attention to chapters, sentences printed in bold, explanations under graphs and images. Read ‘actively’, write down (additional) questions while you are reading and try to find answers to previously asked questions. Write down answers and explanations in the right margin of the text. Take your time for the more complicated parts of the text and read it again if you need to. Give less attention to unimportant information. Reread per part and repeat these parts to yourself in your own words.



4. Recite

Repeat (aloud) in your own words what you have read. Ask yourself questions about the text. Explain what you have read to someone else, you can also do this in your imagination. Making a summary in your own words provides extra support.



5. Review

Read all the relevant parts of the text again, look at your notes. Possibly improve on your notes, paying extra attention to the parts you found difficult. Read your own questions on the left side of the text (cover the answers on the right) and try to answer them. This step is the most effective if you do it a day after step 1 through 4. After following these five steps, you will have actively read a text and you will be better able to remember and explain what it is about



A fourth R, SQ4R, is sometimes added to the reading method. The fourth R can mean different things, for instance Relate, Record or Reflect. This addition can help you to for example create links to knowledge that you already have or personal experiences (Relate). The with Record version is a more extensive version for making the summary and applying structure in the text.



You can for instance record the structure of the text in a schematic representation or highlight the most important parts of the text. The R for Reflect stands for discussing the theme with others, asking yourself what the topic means to you, finding examples or events that clarify the topic. The advantage of the SQ3R Method is that you decide what is in it. It provides a foundation for you to use your own (learning) goals, in order to make it work for you.





REAP



Students must assimilate the information read into their own schemata to facilitate long-term memory. Isolated and unconnected pieces of information easily fade from memory, but postreading activities provide the glue to make a cohesive picture of what is read. Read-Encode-Annotate-Ponder,

REAP, is one of the most basic ways to facilitate higher-order thinking through reading, writing, and thinking.



Read-Encode-Annotate-Ponder (REAP)



REAP is designed to improve thinking, the underlying musculature for active reading and meaningful writing. The idea for this reader-writer exchange system was proposed some time ago (Manzo, 1975) as a means of improving and supporting a national content area reading and writing

project essentially for urban schools. Shortly afterwards it was collected into a teaching-learning approach called REAP—Read-Encode-AnnotatePonder (Eanet & Manzo, 1976; Eanet, 1978, 1983).



The REAP system for responding to text has been in use in elementary through college classrooms for two decades. It is based on a scaffold form of writing that invites creativity, much as does haiku, or any other disciplined form of art (Manzo, Manzo, & Albee, 2002).



REAP primarily is a cognitive-enrichment approach that teaches students to think more precisely and deeply about what they read, by following

the four-step strategy symbolized by its title:



READ to get the writer’s basic message;



ENCODE the message into your own words while reading;



ANNOTATE your analysis of the message by writing responses

from several perspectives, and;



PONDER what you have read and written—first by reviewing

it yourself, then by sharing and discussing it with

others, and finally by reading and discussing the

responses of others.



==================================================================

SEMANTIC  MAP

Semantic mapping is a visual strategy for vocabulary expansion and  extension of knowledge by  displaying in categories words related  to one another" (Kholi, & Sharifafar, 2013). These almost graphic organizers are not pre-made, but made by the students to help "web" out their ideas. Semantic maps go beyond just a graphic organizer. Their strength is  “an adaptation of concept definition mapping but [it] builds on students’ background knowledge or schema. While drawing on prior knowledge, it recognizes important components and shows the relationships among them" (Kholi, & Sharifafar, 2013). This building on previous knowledge is extremely important for their development of vocabulary. It's been well documented by researches that “Instructional activities that allow for a visual display of words and promote students' comparing and contrasting of new words to known words can be a beneficial means for increasing their vocabulary knowledge" (Rupley, Logan, & Nichols, 1998).


Picture
FLOW CHART


Image result for flow chart strategy reading

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Cognitive distortion

Cognitive Distortions

1.All-or-Nothing Thinking / Polarized Thinking

Also known as “Black-and-White Thinking,” this distortion manifests as an inability or unwillingness to see shades of gray. In other words, you see things in terms of extremes – something is either fantastic or awful, you are either perfect or a total failure.

 

2. Overgeneralization

This sneaky distortion takes one instance or example and generalizes it to an overall pattern. For example, a student may receive a C on one test and conclude that she is stupid and a failure. Overgeneralizing can lead to overly negative thoughts about oneself and one’s environment based on only one or two experiences.

 

3. Mental Filter

Similar to overgeneralization, the mental filter distortion focuses on a single negative and excludes all the positive. An example of this distortion is one partner in a romantic relationship dwelling on a single negative comment made by the other partner and viewing the relationship as hopelessly lost, while ignoring the years of positive comments and experiences.

The mental filter can foster a negative view of everything around you by focusing only on the negative.

 

4. Disqualifying the Positive

On the flip side, the “Disqualifying the Positive” distortion acknowledges positive experiences but rejects them instead of embracing them.

For example, a person who receives a positive review at work might reject the idea that they are a competent employee and attribute the positive review to political correctness, or to their boss simply not wanting to talk about their employee’s performance problems.

This is an especially malignant distortion since it can facilitate the continuance of negative thought patterns even in the face of lots of evidence to the contrary.

 

5. Jumping to Conclusions – Mind Reading

This “Jumping to Conclusions” distortion manifests as the inaccurate belief that we know what another person is thinking. Of course, it is possible to have an idea of what other people are thinking, but this distortion refers to the negative interpretations that we jump to.

Seeing a stranger with an unpleasant expression and jumping to the conclusion that they are thinking something negative about you is an example of this distortion.

 

6. Jumping to Conclusions – Fortune Telling

A sister distortion to mind reading, fortune telling refers to the tendency to make conclusions and predictions based on little to no evidence and holding them as gospel truth.

One example of fortune-telling is a young, single woman predicting that she will never find love or have a committed and happy relationship based only on the fact that she has not found it yet. There is simply no way for her to know how her life will turn out, but she sees this prediction as fact rather than one of several possible outcomes.

 

7. Magnification (Catastrophizing) or Minimization

Also known as the “Binocular Trick” for its stealthy skewing of your perspective, this distortion involves exaggerating the importance or meaning of things or minimizing the importance or meaning of things.

An athlete who is generally a good player but makes a mistake may magnify the importance of that mistake and believe that he is a terrible teammate, while an athlete who wins a coveted award in her sport may minimize the importance of the award and continue believing that she is only a mediocre player.

 

8. Emotional Reasoning

This may be one of the most surprising distortions to many readers, and it is also one of the most important to identify and address. The logic behind this distortion is not surprising to most people; rather, it is the realization that virtually all of us have bought into this distortion at one time or another.

Emotional reasoning refers to the acceptance of one’s emotions as fact. It can be described as “I feel it, therefore it must be true.” Of course, we know this isn’t a reasonable belief, but it is a common one nonetheless.

Relevant: What is Emotional Intelligence? + 18 Ways to Improve It

 

9. Should Statements

Another particularly damaging distortion is the tendency to make “should” statements. Should statements are statements that you make to yourself about what you “should” do, what you “ought” to do, or what you “must” do. They can also be applied to others, imposing a set of expectations that will likely not be met.

When we hang on too tightly to our “should” statements about ourselves, the result is often guilt that we cannot live up to them. When we cling to our “should” statements about others, we are generally disappointed by the failure of the others to meet our expectations, leading to anger and resentment.

 

10. Labeling and Mislabeling

These tendencies are basically extreme forms of overgeneralization, in which we assign judgments of value to ourselves or to others based on one instance or experience.

For example, a student who labels herself as “an utter fool” for failing an assignment is engaging in this distortion, as is the waiter who labels a customer “a grumpy old miser” if he fails to thank the waiter for bringing his food. Mislabeling refers to the application of highly emotional, loaded language when labeling.

 

11. Personalization

As the name implies, this distortion involves taking everything personally or assigning blame to yourself for no logical reason to believe you are to blame.

This distortion covers a wide range of situations, from assuming you are the reason a friend did not enjoy the girl’s night out, to the more severe examples of believing that you are the cause for every instance of moodiness or irritation in those around you.

In addition to these basic cognitive distortions, Beck and Burns have mentioned a few others (Beck, 1976; Burns, 1980):

 

12. Control Fallacies

A control fallacy manifests as one of two beliefs: (1) that we have no control over our lives and are helpless victims of fate, or (2) that we are in complete control of ourselves and our surroundings, giving us responsibility for the feelings of those around us. Both beliefs are damaging, and both are equally inaccurate.

No one is in complete control of what happens to them, and no one has absolutely no control over their situation. Even in extreme situations where an individual seemingly has no choices in what they do, where they go, or what they say, they still have a certain amount of control over how they approach their situation mentally.

 

13. Fallacy of Fairness

While we would all probably prefer to operate in a world that is fair, this assumption is not based in reality and can foster negative feelings when we are faced with proof of life’s unfairness.

A person who judges every experience by its perceived fairness has fallen for this fallacy, and will likely feel anger, resentment, and hopelessness when they inevitably encounter a situation that is not fair.

 

14. Fallacy of Change

Another fallacy distortion involves expecting others to change if we pressure or encourage them enough. This distortion is usually accompanied by a belief that our happiness and success rests on other people, leading us to believe that forcing those around us to change is the only way to get what we want.

A man who thinks “If I just encourage my wife to stop doing the things that irritate me, I can be a better husband and a happier person” is exhibiting the fallacy of change.

 

15. Always Being Right

Perfectionists and those struggling with Imposter Syndrome will recognize this distortion – it is the belief that we must always be right, correct, or accurate. With this distortion, the idea that we could be wrong is absolutely unacceptable, and we will fight to the metaphorical death to prove that we are right.

For example, the internet commenters who spend hours arguing with each other over an opinion or political issue far beyond the point where reasonable individuals would conclude that they should “agree to disagree” are engaging in the “Always Being Right” distortion. To them, it is not simply a matter of a difference of opinion, it is an intellectual battle that must be won at all costs.

 

16. Heaven’s Reward Fallacy

This distortion is a popular one, particularly with the myriad examples of this fallacy playing out on big and small screens across the world. The “Heaven’s Reward Fallacy” manifests as a belief that one’s struggles, one’s suffering, and one’s hard work will result in a just reward.

It is obvious why this type of thinking is a distortion – how many examples can you think of, just within the realm of your personal acquaintances, where hard work and sacrifice did not pay off?

Sometimes no matter how hard we work or how much we sacrifice, we will not achieve what we hope to achieve. To think otherwise is a potentially damaging pattern of thought that can result in disappointment, frustration, anger, and even depression when the awaited reward does not materialize.

Wednesday, October 9, 2019

Training on Psychometric approach to Psychological counselling.

Background

Psychometric approach to Psychological counselling helps client breaking down  perception of self and the surroundings into 'grades' so that perception can be scaled. Scaling helps the client and counselor to understand extent of success and failure of the counselling across different target areas for intervention. This approach is non-clinical and non-labeling. Client becomes able to construct and reconstruct the environment. Client more readily takes ownership of their treatment goals and progress when asked to rate them on a scale.


Assumptions

This approach has some assumptions :

(a)  individuals  are healthy  and  competent;  
(b)  they  have  the  innate capacity to construct  solutions  and  meanings that can enhance their lives; 
(c)  Individual is able to scale own abilities, self-concept and treatment goal 
(d) Individuals  do  not  resist  change;  they in fact want to change
(e) Scaling the change helps both counselor and the client  to reduce counseling time.


ANNOUNCEMENT


A. Course title : Training on Psychometric approach to Psychological counselling. 
B. Organized by : Psychology Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata campus. 
C. Objective : Aim of the training is to disseminate knowledge about Psychometric scaling procedure in Psychological counselling. 
D. Qualification: Post graduation in  Psychology with knowledge about Psychological counselling. 
E. Eligibility : Good knowledge in Psychometrics.
F. Topics

1. Measurement in Counselling procedure, Research design in Counselling effectiveness. 
2. Solution focused therapy 
3.Psychometric scaling. 
4. Psychometric Counselling.

G. Date and time : 15-16th October, 2019, 11-4 PM. 

H. Registration :It is free to join. Register soon. First come first serve basis. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfFQOwNVsk1ep8uSeAgquXOHlCRsgs_Z_-XsAWXfuOx5Saxiw/viewform?vc=0&c=0&w=1

I. Seats : Not more than 10 seats. 
J. VenuePsychology Research Unit, 7th Floor, P.J.Auditorium, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata campus. 




TENTATIVE PROGRAMME


15.10.19 (Tuesday)
Inauguration

11-11:30 : Inauguration
11:30-1:30 : Measurement in Psychological counselling - Dr. Rama Manna, Head, Department of Guidance and counselling, Indian Institute of Psychometry, Kolkata.
1:30-2: Lunch time
2-4 : Solution focused therapy - Ms. Sabornee Karmakar, M. Phil in Clinical Psychology, Sr. Research fellow, Psychology Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata. 

16.10.19

11-1:30 : Psychological scales and scaling - Dr. Rita Karmakar, Assistant professor, Amity Institute of Psychology and Allied Sciences. Amity University Kolkata. 
1:30-2Lunch time
2-4 : Case studies on Psychometric counseling. - Dr. Debdulal Dutta Roy, Head, Psychology Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata.